PulseGatePost-LLM Market IndexGlobal signals across software, agents & workflows (since 2022)
Methodology

PRIMARY TRUST PAGE

Methodology

How PulseGate defines coverage, interprets public signals, and builds the market index.

What PulseGate measures

PulseGate tracks public software entities and topic momentum using directional signals that can be compared across windows, categories, and ranking views.

The product is designed to read market movement, not private business performance. It favors durable public evidence over single-surface spikes.

What is included

Listed entities are public-facing software products, models, infrastructure tools, and workflow products with a canonical public URL or recognized store surface.

  • Public product sites, docs, and official listings
  • Structured store or marketplace entries where the product identity is clear
  • Corroborating update, ranking, or activity signals from public sources

What is excluded

PulseGate does not list private tools, thin placeholder sites, obvious duplicates, or entities that cannot be anchored to a stable public identity.

  • Personal portfolios or one-off landing pages without product evidence
  • Dead or suppressed entities that no longer meet public-surface requirements
  • Mirrors, clones, and non-canonical duplicates

Signal families

Signals are grouped into ranking, intake, update, and corroboration families. Each family contributes directional evidence rather than absolute truth.

  • Entity growth and intake velocity
  • Public update or release activity
  • Topic/event momentum and coverage breadth
  • Canonical identity and duplicate resolution checks

Refresh and latency

Public stats, ranking reads, and topic surfaces refresh on different cadences. Freshness labels indicate recent public visibility, not source-side real-time guarantees.

Short-lived source delays can leave rankings or topics temporarily stale even when the overall product remains healthy.

Limitations

Coverage is incomplete by design. PulseGate is strongest as a directional market surface and weaker as a source of exhaustive coverage or product quality judgments.

  • Public-source bias
  • Category and region asymmetry
  • Latency between source changes and reflected ranking movement
  • No claim that score equals revenue, quality, or adoption depth