Rapid URL Indexer vs. Linkdexing is a comparison page about URL indexing services for Google Search. It frames Rapid URL Indexer and Linkdexing as tools for getting URLs indexed, and it says the comparison is aimed at SEO professionals. The page presents Rapid URL Indexer as the stronger option, citing a higher average indexing rate, faster indexing times, transparent pricing, and a risk-free experience.
The comparison gives several concrete details about Rapid URL Indexer. It states an average indexing rate of 91% and says URLs are crawled by Googlebot almost immediately after project submission. It also says the first indexing report is available after 4 days and the final report after 14 days. For pricing, it lists a pay-as-you-go model at $0.05 or less per indexed URL, with credit packages of 500 credits for $25, 1,500 credits for $68, 5,000 credits for $213, and 50,000 credits for $2,000. A 100% auto-refund policy returns credits for URLs that are not indexed within 14 days.
Other listed features include an API, a WordPress plugin, detailed reporting, visual analytics, and CSV data export. The page also says Rapid URL Indexer supports press releases, mass page websites, backlinks, social profiles, and SEO test pages. It describes the service as using safe, white hat methods. For support, it names email, FAQ, and documentation. In the comparison table, the minimum package is shown as 20 URLs for $1, and the service is marked as offering an affiliate program and reseller options.
Linkdexing is described more narrowly. The page says it functions as a URL submission service that uses manual processing techniques to get backlinks and web pages crawled and indexed by Google’s search engine. It lists Linkdexing’s average indexing rate as 80%, its price as $0.05 per submitted URL, and its process time as around two weeks. The table also shows 10 free credits on sign-up and a minimum package of 200 links for $10. Several Linkdexing fields are marked unclear in the comparison.
What PulseGate has recorded for this listing
Closest matches by what these projects do